Surprise, Surprise: Basic Cable Costs More in Towns without FCC Regulation

Guess what happens when regulators don’t restrict cable rates, and when there’s not much legitimate competition in the marketplace? Cable companies jack up the rates. Whodathunkit?

In Boston, where the FCC doesn’t regulate cable prices, the rates charged by Comcast for basic cable have increased by more than 60% in the last three years. The result is that in Boston and other municipalities without FCC regulation, basic cable costs far more—sometimes more than double—the rates charged in nearby towns where the FCC steps in.

The Boston Globe cites data rounded up at the behest of Boston officials by Front Range Consulting showing basic cable rates in three Massachusetts communities with regulation (Cambridge, Chelsea, Malden) range from $7.30 to $11.72 a month—a fraction of the $15.80 – 17.50 monthly basic cable costs in Boston, Brookline, and Everett, which have no FCC regulation.

Why do some communities have regulation, while others do not? Well, regulators are supposed to stay on the sidelines in towns that have more than one cable company. The idea is that competition should, in theory, keep rates from soaring. In Boston, RCN competes with Comcast for cable subscribers, but it’s not much of a competition: RCN has only 15,000 subscribers, compared to 170,000 residents paying Comcast each month. And those Comcast subscribers are paying significantly more than they did just a few years ago: The cheapest basic cable cost just $9.05 a month in 2008, and now rates are up to $15.80.

Part of me wonders why anyone pays at all for these limited basic cable packages. Granted, they’re cheap(ish), but they get subscribers only about 20 channels. That’s not much more than you’d get by purchasing an antenna and watching free over-the-air TV. City officials in Boston are asking the FCC to start regulating cable rates, but perhaps the best thing the city could do for residents is hand out or offer discounts on antennas.

MORE:
2011: The Year of the Cord Cutter
Why Consumers Are Sick of Escalating Cable Bills, But Just Can’t Quit Pay TV

Related Topics: Boston, Comcast, pay TV, RCN, tv, Saving & Spending, Smart Spending
  • Latest on Moneyland

    Getty Images

    L.A. Parents Pony Up For Kids’ V.I.P. Lounge Access at Sixth-Grade Dance

    Most middle-school kids have better things to think about than whether or not they’re members of the 1%. But one Los Angeles charter school upped the ante on the usual social anxieties of its annual dance when it installed a “V.I.P. lounge” — with a separate cover charge. On top of the $15 dance admission, students — or, more likely, their parents — can choose to pay an additional $5 to be a cool kid — excuse me, get access to a special “V.I.P.” area. 

    America's Uneven Economic Recovery: The 10 Best and 10 Worst CitiesDaily Finance

    Adam Gault / Getty Images

    Too Much to Drink? AAA’s ‘Tipsy Tow’ Offers Free Rides for You & Your Car This Weekend

    To prevent drunk driving, AAA clubs around the country are offering free rides to folks who’ve celebrated too much to safely get behind the wheel over Memorial Day weekend. They’ll also tow your car home—again, free of charge. Amazingly, the service is available even if you’re not a AAA member.

  • tracyweb

    Like some others here, another option is the TVDevo website which lets you watch TV over the ineternet from around the world. They also have on-demand TV shows.

  • http://dazedandinfused.wordpress.com Dazed & Infused

    “Part of me wonders why anyone pays at all for these limited basic cable packages.”

    Comcast gives a $15 discount for a bundle, so even if they charged $14 for the basic cable it still makes cable + internet cheaper than just internet. I’ve also lived in 7 places throughout Boston & Cambridge and none of them got great over-the-air reception–there are too many large brick buildings, hills, and other obstacles.

    My wife & I live in cambridge and have the basic & internet bundle and are fairly happy with it at about $55/month. If it were more expensive we’d settle for slower DSL speeds at a much lower cost.

blog comments powered by Disqus